In Sydney, where the skyline is constantly reshaped by cranes and tunneling machines there's a growing movement that's gaining momentum. The YIMBYs—'Yes In My Back Yard'—are rallying for a future where city living is synonymous with sustainability, accessibility, and communal harmony.
At the heart of the YIMBY ethos is the belief that Sydney's flurry of transport projects—most notably the Metro line—is not only about infrastructural growth but also about nurturing a city that's livable in the truest sense.
Sharath, a fervent advocate and a key figure within the Sydney YIMBY group, argues for a paradigm shift in urban development. According to Sharath if public transportation is more accessible and density increased, then fewer people will drive, leading to a better experience and less traffic, but an impediment to this has been the NIMBYs (Not in my back yard) - people who are happy for things to change just not in their own neighbourhood.
But I’ve always wondered whether the influence of NIMBYs is overstated by developers - I personally thing - although they are no doubt an influence - it’s mostly planning laws and councils that have been instrumental in stifling development.
Sharath poses a critical question: Are we prioritising the right kind of infrastructure? He suggests we have enough roads. What Sydney needs is to amplify its public transport networks, challenging the prevailing road-building spree. According to Sharath, it's not a question of whether roads are necessary—they are—but rather if the current focus on road infrastructure is detracting from more sustainable and community-friendly alternatives, like public transport.
The crux of the debate boils down to adaptation. Sharath confidently believes that Sydneysiders are ready to embrace change and adapt their lifestyles around a more robust public transportation system, negating the need for a 'minimum standard' of freeways.
But what of the most important projects that are yet to break ground? The new light rail stands out as a beacon of the future Sydney could have. It symbolises3 a potential shift towards a more interconnected, less congested urban landscape.
As we delve into this narrative of urban transformation, it's essential to weigh the voices of both YIMBYs and NIMBYs. Is the threat posed by NIMBYism overstated, or do their concerns hold water in a rapidly evolving cityscape?
This battle for the neighbourhood is more than just a clash of ideologies; it's a discussion about the kind of future we envision for our cities. It's a dialogue between progress and preservation, between evolving needs and established norms.
Check out the podcast episode with Sharath Mahendran here.